The Bush Truth Commission

Mark Green, the perennial also-ran New York politician and Air America radio personality, has proposed a brilliant and necessary idea.

He asks: “How can we hold Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Feith, Wolfowitz, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Woo and all of them accountable?”

His response? A Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In his words:

“This worked in a very different historical situation of South Africa and can work here as well. There, South Africans who engaged in murder and violence were given amnesty if they confessed under oath to their crimes and knowledge…but would be prosecuted if they didn’t. Of some 7110 seeking amnesty, 849 were granted it for “politically motivated” crimes…which in turn provided evidence to pressure and prosecute others. The largely successful effort led to both truth and reconciliation.

If Richard Nixon had his Leon Jaworski, a special prosecutor who sent 29 aides to jail, who will investigate George W. Bush? If massive prosecutions is too big a bite for a 44th president wanting to look to the future, here’s a fair, workable compromise to make sure that the past doesn’t become prologue.

In 2009 a new President could choose a new Attorney General who similarly announces that s/he will prosecute past officials for unlawful acts unless they first come forward and testify under oath. Because Bushies took literally their oaths to “faithfully execute the laws,” their record amounts to a near executive coup d’etat. Such examples include:

* condoning torture;
* ignoring the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act;
* assigning officials to politically campaign in open violation of the Hatch Act;
* refusing to enforce the Clean Air Act;
* spending money for propaganda as the Pentagon did in gathering former brass to hit the airwaves;
* violating contracting rules by giving lucrative contracts to favored firms,
* engaging in cronyism and coercion to influence prosecutions in the U.S. Attorneys
* abusing signing statements.

Indeed, even mere falsehoods could be investigated if they were under oath to Congress or if they legally vouched for false budgets, as Sarbanes Oxley explicitly does for CEOs attesting to annual reports.

If what we know about lies and illegalities is largely what managed to leak out or has been disclosed by a few insiders, imagine how much more may come out when a new administration turns over 43’s rock of corruption?

A TRC for the Bush-Cheney administration would be unprecedented for the U.S. But so is a government of crooks and liars who misled us into a calamitous war and openly violated the U.S. Constitution. Or is it only consensual sexual misconduct by a president that warrants the attention of investigators? The way to deter the “culture of deception” in McClellan’s subtitle is a combination of voters, lawyers, prosecutors and a Truth Commission — to vote against it, sue it, prosecute it, or expose it. Do we believe in the Rule of Law or only the ‘Law’ of Rule?”

Personally, I believe these criminals should be prosecuted, but let’s face it, most, if not all, of them won’t be. There is a world of wrong-doing and illegality under the carpets of the White House right now. In sweeping it out, Obama and the Dems should make sure that they stand up for this country (see previous post).

It ain’t political. It’s the law.

Advertisements

4 Responses to The Bush Truth Commission

  1. Mark In Irvine says:

    Brilliant; genius; great idea.

  2. bandit says:

    Sorry – this is just partisan bullshit.

  3. section9 says:

    Oh sure. What a brilliant idea. The winning political party persecutes the high officials of the Administration of the losing political party. That’s like, a stroke of genius. That will insure really peaceful transfers of power in the future, won’t it?

    Jesus Hussein Christ!

    Leave it to Liberals to come up with grabastic bullshit right out of a Paraguayan State of Siege. When Jonah Goldberg wrote that liberalism was a lineal descendant of Italian fascism, he wasn’t kidding.

    Yah, Moscow Show Trials. That’ll unite the country!

  4. Is it too flippant to comment that “what goes around comes around”? Think back: Whitewater investigation [no wrongdoing by Clintons]; Monica Lewinsky [Clinton lied about a private matter that had absolutely nothing to do with governance of America].

    What are you afraid of? People testifying under oath before the Truth Commission will get immunity. I bet you favor immunity for the telecommunications companies that abetted the administration’s unlawful wiretapping. If former administration officials refuse to testify, they can take their chances on prosecution for one thing or another.

    It’s all about the truth, baby – rumor has it it will set you free.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: