Ranking the New York Times Columnists

The editorial page of the New York Times is arguably the most influential in the world. Lately, I’ve begun to feel that the page has grown a little stale. In an attempt to understand why, I decided to rank the columnists who regularly appear there. This ranking system is presented beginning with the worst columnist (#11) and continues to the best (#1), and is measured on a purely subjective qualitative scale.

So, without further ado:

11. Irving Kristol’s son. This smug, lizard-faced, son-of-privilege delights in writing columns that he believes tweak the noses of the Times liberal readership. This is, as far as I can tell, his only goal. When he signed on, he was already way overexposed writing and editing for the Weekly Standard, appearing on Fox News, etc. It still remains a mystery why the NY Times felt this “useful idiot” needed another platform. A disastrous addition, expect him to be gone in one year.

10. Thomas Friedman. This self-important Iraq War supporter is responsible for foisting the worst metaphor in the history of metaphors upon an unsuspecting public with “The World is Flat.” A globalist lapdog, he is beloved by a middle-brow audience for his “Aftab Meets the Future” columns and equivocal analyses of complex situations. Rarely worth the read (now he’s going green, ugh), somehow he’s the star of the paper. He’ll be there for as long as he wants.

9. Roger Cohen. The Parisian Partisan. Combines a love of France with oddly unsexy writing. He is a longtime foreign correspondent who originally appeared as a columnist in the International Herald Tribune. His opinions reflect a bien-pensant benignity that would be right at home during cocktails at Bernard Kouchner’s. His columns are eminently skippable. Seems like a decent fellow, though.

8. Nicholas Kristof. In a word? Borrrrring. He bleeds for the world and wants you to bleed, too. Darfur, sex trafficking, the occasional toe dipped into the Middle East. Somehow he makes these topics seem even more wonkishly mind-numbing than they actually are. I appreciate the effort, I really do, but I don’t read him very often. If I’m ever feeling too pleased with life, I’ll give him a shot, but otherwise I’d sooner read the letters to the editor.

7. Charles Blow. Haven’t the faintest idea who this is. He’s listed on the website as publishing every other Saturday. I’m not sure if I’ve ever read anything he’s written.

6. David Brooks. Brooks is still capable of a broad social insight and a truly thought-provoking piece, but he might be overtaxed by the demands of the paper. He seems to want to come up with a fresh idea for every column and some of them are hurting (did you read that weird, dorky one about the magic of the Middle Ages?). That said, Brooks is a good writer and a smart guy and he should stay. Maybe just one column a week?

5. Paul Krugman. It pains me to put him here because he was, easily, the best columnist they had during the Bush years. His scalding attacks left you breathless with their intelligence, research, and evocative writing. But Krugman might be like Churchill; without a war, he’s just an irritating eccentric. Now that Bush is winding down, Krugman’s political columns have become flat and, often, misguided. Despite that, he’s got to stay, if only for his brilliant and clear writing on economics and related topics.

4. Bob Herbert. Even when he’s writing about something dull or obvious, which is fairly often, Herbert draws me in. His prose style makes convincing points without unnecessary flair and he’s capable of tugging on the heart strings. When Herbert writes about sex trafficking, you read it. He is a powerful, populist force on a sometimes sadly removed opinion page. He’s there to stay.

3. Maureen Dowd. The paper’s other big star, she’s clever as all hell and loves to show it. Plus, she’s kind of hot for an older broad. I don’t have much to complain about with Dowd, except that she’s a little bitter about men. She’s got a bead on Washington and a sense of fairness and common sense backed up by a wicked vocabulary and the tools to wield it like a knife.

2. Gail Collins. I’m surprised by this one myself. Collins used to run the page and now writes on Mondays and Thursdays. I’ve been reading her columns on the campaign and they are laugh-out-loud funny. I swear I’m on the subway snorting into my shirt. She happily deflates any political pretension and serves up a serious dose of real world perspective. She has quickly supplanted Dowd as the best (Irish-American?) woman on the page.

And, the winner is:

1. Frank Rich. Rich is always on-point, always ahead of the game, always capable of a new, interesting idea or a startling insight. His prose is accessible, but nuanced. He brings gravity and seriousness to his columns while sacrificing nothing in terms of, yes, pleasure in reading. Rich writes once a week on Sundays and this is a good perch for him. His column is the first one I check in the Week in Review.

So there you have it. My suggestion is that Andrew Rosenthal gets rid of the last five (or keep Blow, but give him real shot) and adds some fresh blood to the page. Here, as an added bonus, are my suggestions for the additions:

To fill the foreign policy hole: Tony Judt and Fareed Zakaria

To supplement internally: Michiko Kakutani (with guns blazing), Natalie Angier (they definitely need more science writing on the editorial page), Gretchen Morgenson (and good business writing too), and, if she isn’t taking a buyout and retiring forever, Linda Greenhouse.

To add a little youthful point-counterpoint: Matt Taibbi and Jonah Goldberg.

That’s it.

Advertisements

11 Responses to Ranking the New York Times Columnists

  1. mcs says:

    Tough call between Dowd and Collins, but I think you’ve done a great job ranking them (and your commentary is spot-on, for the most part). Thanks for this entertaining/informative piece.

  2. dee says:

    Brilliant post though i strongly disagree with the position of Paul Krugman. He’s still the best liberal columnist in the ny times.

  3. MediaAddict says:

    Nice analysis, but you’re wrong on two points. Thomas Friedman is a star for a reason and he should be #1. There is no more influential writer in the Times. And I think Dowd is overated.

  4. Nila says:

    I agree with Dee Says: brilliant post!

  5. blkcp20 says:

    If Bill Kristol is overexposed so is Fareed Zakaria.

  6. […] NY Times’s Charles Blow In my recent post ranking the NY Times columnists, I wrote that I hadn’t the faintest idea who Charles Blow was. He is published on the […]

  7. ejerry says:

    Frank Rich is an incredible writer, and his columns are always powerful. I look for him every Sunday before I even look at the front page and, as was the case last Sunday, when is takes a day off, my day is shot.

  8. sub says:

    the other day, charles blow wrote that if obama loses, it’s because we’re a racist country….. this paper is a joke, through and through, and everybody with .5 of a brain knows it. it deosn’t matter anymore. today, the public editor managed to identify the times double standard re the McCain v. Edwards adultery stories without ever thinking to posit WHY? the public editor needs a public editor. Uncle!……

  9. Tom B. says:

    Good job – both on correct ranking and reasons given. One caveat: G. Morgenson is about as insightful as my dog – and I don’t have a dog. The other day (Meltdown Day) she was prattling on video about the mess on Wall St. bringing down the “positives” of the Main St. economy. Please!!!??? What positives????

    I have never heard this woman give anything but the party line…

    Tom B.

  10. Sarah B says:

    Definitely not Matt Taibbi, ever. He can be funny sometimes, but his over-the-top hatred of evangelicals colors everything he writes, to the point where it’s seriously offputting. And Jonah Goldberg… this is the guy who wrote a book trying to explain why the phrase “liberal fascism” makes sense, then got taken back to school for it by John Scalzi on the latter’s blog. Come on, are these the best examples of “youthful” writers you could come up with? For conservatives you could have the guys who wrote Grand New Party, and for liberals… no particular examples come to mind, but I have a feeling there are rather a lot.

    I’d probably move Kristof up the list a bit, if only because I’m a fellow bleeding-heart. 🙂 But I do agree with you about Gail Collins. She’s wonderful.

  11. STL says:

    Do the WashPost’s too!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: